Checklists for preparation and analysis of microscopy images
An international group of light microscopists provides guidelines on how to process raw microscopy images and assemble them for publication in a standardised and reproducible manner.
Images are an integral part of science communication. Bright colours, formatting, and graphical elements can captivate viewers faster and more easily than plain text. Microscopy images are nowadays widely used in biomedical publications. These images are more than pictures as they contain information (also known as metadata) that can be extracted, quantified, and reused. It is therefore essential that microscopy images be processed and presented in a clear and standardised manner to be fully informative and accessible to the scientific community thereby enhancing the reproducibility of the results.
This is one of the goals of an international group of light microscopists that has launched the Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments & Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative, including Christopher Schmied, the lead author and a former member in Florian Jug’s team at the Human Technopole Computational Biology Research Centre.
The QUAREP-LiMi provided guidelines in the form of checklists to increase the clarity and quality of microscopy image presentation and workflow analysis. These checklists have now been published in Nature Methods.
According to QUAREP-LiMi, insightful microscopy images in a publication should always be accompanied by experimental metadata and a clear description of image analysis workflows, which should be made available to the research community via image and code repositories in accordance with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. Additionally, microscopy images should be readable by colour-blind persons, representative, and reproducible.
The checklists for the publication and analysis of microscopy images fulfil these requirements and the need to promote open and reproducible research. The QUAREP-LiMi defines i) a “minimal” reporting level, which includes necessary and non-negotiable information for image publication; ii) a “recommended” reporting level ensuring full understanding of the images and facilitating evaluation of image analysis by the readers; and iii) an “ideal” reporting level that provides all information.
Although designed for microscopy images, these checklists may easily be adapted for other types of scientific images, such as photographs and medical images.
In addition, such guidelines will be useful for publishers, staff in core facilities, and trainers to set gold standards for good research practice.
Share:
You could also like:
-
Italy at the centre of the Genome of Europe project
The Human Technopole, ELIXIR Italia, the national node of the European life sciences research infrastructure coordinated by the National Research Council (CNR), and the Centro Cardiologico Monzino, as the Italian coordinating centre, have been selected as the Italian partners of Genome of Europe (GoE), the largest EU-funded genomic project, whose ultimate goal is to make […]
-
Human Technopole wins 2024 Oscar di Bilancio
On Friday 13 December, at Palazzo Mezzanotte in Milan, the Human Technopole Foundation’s ‘Integrated Report 2023’ received the Oscar di Bilancio in the social enterprises and non-profit organisations category. The award was presented to President Gianmario Verona, Elena Trovesi, Head of Administration, as well as the project leaders Giovanni Selmi, Head of Finance, and Alessandro […]
-
Mosaic Organoids to Study the Brains of Multiple Patients Simultaneously
An international team of scientists from Human Technopole and the University of Milan has developed and validated an innovative approach to studying human brain development across multiple individuals simultaneously using single organoids—laboratory models that replicate key cellular processes of human neurodevelopment. The research paves the way for in vitro population studies. Additionally, the scientists have developed a novel computational method to more accurately quantify the genetic identity of individual cells profiled from multiple individuals concurrently. The findings have been published in Nature Methods.
-
Cancer stem cell morphology predicts glioblastoma growth and resistance
Human Technopole researchers have identified adducin-γ (ADD3) as a crucial regulator of glioblastoma cancer stem cell morphology and intercellular bridges between tumour cells. These connections facilitate communication and allow tumour cells to share resources, evade chemotherapy, and survive in challenging conditions. The study has been funded by AIRC and the findings are published in Life Science Alliance.
-
Colorectal Cancer: ML Enhances Cetuximab Response Predictions
An international collaborative study led by Human Technopole, Candiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS in Turin, the University of Turin, and the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Cambridge (UK) has identified new factors associated with therapeutic response in colorectal cancer. The research has led to the development of a machine-learning model capable of accurately predicting the effects of cetuximab, a drug in clinical use, on different colorectal tumour subtypes. Funded by the AIRC Foundation, the study paves the way to identifying molecular features that could serve as biomarkers for predicting treatment response in patients with this type of cancer.